Established institutions backed by government contracts and corporate interests may look like unassailable fortresses in the moment?


 

In Hit Piece on Florida Surgeon General, Editor of Science Holds True to Role of ‘Useful Idiot’

Holden Thorp, editor-in-chief of Science, last week published a hit piece targeting Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, M.D., Ph.D., a man who is undoubtedly Thorp’s better — both in terms of scientific understanding and conscientious integrity.

Miss a day, miss a lot. Subscribe to The Defender’s Top News of the DayIt’s free. A towering genius can be a babe in the woods. A high-functioning scientist can be a useful idiot. Let me explain. Schwinger: a ‘babe in the woods’ The smartest man I ever knew tried to teach me relativistic quantum field theory when I was a 20-year-old Harvard undergrad. By the time he was that age, Julian Schwinger had already collaborated as an equal with J Robert Oppenheimer and Hans Bethe. Before he was 30, he (in parallel with Richard Feynman and Shin’ichiro Tomonaga) had invented the field of relativistic quantum theory. It would take the Nobel Committee an additional 18 years to recognize that Schwinger was the rightful successor of Paul Dirac — two men who could write the most abstruse mathematics from the tops of their heads. Schwinger’s intelligence was not of a kind that could be gauged by a numerical IQ. He had a long and distinguished career, contributing both to practical and fundamental advances in physics. Every article he ever wrote was eagerly welcomed by the world’s most prestigious physics journal, Physical Review D. Throughout his life, he had no experience with the politics of scientific publishing because he worked at a level so far above his colleagues. He had great integrity, and he never abused the wide discretion afforded him by a grateful community of physicists. Schwinger was semi-retired in California when he heard of the most surprising experimental finding of his lifetime. Hydrogen had been known to fuse into helium at the center of the sun, or at comparable temperatures inside a thermonuclear bomb. But in 1989, Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann announced that they had observed fusion at room temperature in an apparatus that was little more than a glorified battery. Some months later, Schwinger thought he had an idea of how this unexpected effect could be explained, and he submitted his theory to Physical Review D without a thought about politics. Imagine his surprise when the journal sent his manuscript back to him. The editors refused to review it because their policy dictated that they not publish anything to do with cold fusion. Mr. Science had decided that Pons and Fleischmann must have been mistaken because surely fusion could not occur at room temperature. When experiment disagrees with theory, throw out the experiment. We can’t know what Mr. Science was thinking. He certainly had grounds to think that the reports of Pons and Fleischmann did not fit well with conventional understandings of nuclear physics. He may also have realized that cold fusion was an energy source with potential to bankrupt a trillion-dollar fossil fuel industry. MIT seems to have been at the center of the public relations campaign about the failure to reproduce cold fusion, and MIT was the recipient of hundreds of millions annually in tokamak, or hot fusion, research grants. When it came to politics, Schwinger was — by the time he submitted his manuscript on hot fusion — a 72-year-old babe in the woods. He was discovering what lesser minds than his had had to learn from experience at an early age: The scientific establishment can be quite political. Some ideas are third rail. Cold fusion was too hot to handle. Schwinger was beside himself. This unreasoned, unconsidered rejection was outside anything he had ever experienced. He publicly resigned from the American Physical Society (publisher of Physical Review D) with a letter that charged, “The replacement of impartial reviewing by censorship will be the death of science.” Henceforth, he would submit his manuscripts to an obscure Japanese journal, and thus the light of his brilliance was swallowed in a black hole. A generous soul, a mind beyond brilliant, a character of impeccable integrity, Schwinger died a disillusioned and embittered man in 1994. Thorp: a ‘useful idiot’ Holden Thorp, Ph.D., is a natural scientist, a competent but unexceptional chemist. He was still a young man when he moved from research to science administration. By the time he was 43, Thorp was chancellor of the University of North Carolina and later provost of Washington University in St. Louis. A decade later, he became editor-in-chief of Science — a meteoric rise to the pinnacle of the science bureaucracy. As head of the most prestigious family of journals in the world, he has enormous authority — but how much real power does he really wield? He can keep his position so long as his writing and his policies comport with the interests that fund science and keep science in its place. Fortunately, it is not in Thorp’s nature to rock boats — if it were, he would never have risen to the exalted status that he now enjoys. Thorp is a useful idiot with a 130 IQ. Last week, Thorp published a lead editorial in his own journal. It was a hit piece, targeting a man who is undoubtedly Thorp’s better — both in terms of scientific understanding and conscientious integrity. And yet, I have little doubt that Thorp thought he was doing the right and noble thing. He has full faith in the scientific establishment. Why shouldn’t he? It is the same establishment that has recognized Thorp’s worth and elevated him to his present status. The editorial was published under the title, “Remember, do no harm?,” which we may read as a meme percolating from Thorp’s unconscious. His target is Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, M.D., Ph.D. If you are not yet unacquainted with Lapado, an inspiring life story awaits you. His biography almost convinces you that the American dream is alive and well. Ladapo: an ‘American dream’ As a child, Ladapo came to the U.S. from Nigeria with a family struggling to adjust. He excelled as a Wake Forest University undergraduate and won a place in the 2000 entering class of Harvard Medical School. With an M.D. and Ph.D. from Harvard, he went on to a career combining patient care with medical research and health policy at some of America’s top medical schools. He is yet a young man, who has authored 81 peer-reviewed publications. When the COVID-19 pandemic was invented, Ladapo saw exactly what was happening, and he was courageous enough to write about it. He threw down the gauntlet with a series of guest editorials in the Wall Street Journal, beginning in April 2020, with the truth bomb that “Lockdowns Won’t Stop the Spread.” It was natural that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis would invite Ladapo to move to Florida to implement a sensible COVID-19 policy that includes the most effective early treatments and balances public health measures with personal liberties. As a solid scientist with impeccable credentials, as a truthteller with a background that American progressives want to admire, as a credible voice with a subversive message, Ladapo is dangerous to the COVID-19 narrative and to the medical establishment. Thorp did not have to be told that protecting the establishment from such upstarts is central to his job description. Thorp’s editorial begins with guilt by an association that many of The Defender’s readers would join me in saying should be a source of admiration. He writes: “When the advocacy group America’s Frontline Doctors appeared on the steps of the United States Supreme Court in 2020, falsely stating that hydroxychloroquine was a cure for COVID-19, their pronouncement was virally shared by right-wing media and soundly debunked by medical academicians.” How many errors are squeezed into this one opening salvo? No one used the word “cure” in that July 27, 2020, White Coat Summit press conference. Experienced clinicians shared their successes using a protocol that had been promoted months earlier by Dr. Zev Zelenko. Why doesn’t Thorp cite any evidence that hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work? Why is there no footnote to tell us just how the claims of America’s Frontline Doctors were “debunked?” And how dangerous is it to all of us who depend on research to guide our medical decisions when a person with Thorp’s reach and influence decides peremptorily that scientific debate must be squelched? Thorp goes on to tender the outrageous presumption that “Ladapo’s faculty appointment was the result of political pressure by the university’s administration.” Here, he steps right over the obvious facts that the University of Florida was a step down from Ladapo’s prestigious appointment at the University of California, Los Angeles, and that a man of his credentials and background would be highly prized by any faculty in the country. Thorp sidesteps the science and goes straight to name-calling and guilt by association. Clearly, Thorp is unfamiliar with the research — otherwise, he would have known that hydroxychloroquine, in combination with zinc, is an effective early treatment that has kept millions of COVID-19 patients out of the hospital. You can read about it here and here and here and here. This website summarizes the results from 367 studies. If he had been motivated to read, Thorp would have known that the most egregious scandal in the history of The Lancet unfolded in the spring of 2020, when a study purporting to show that hydroxychloroquine was harmful to COVID-19 patients — a paper they had featured prominently — was revealed to be a fabrication. Thorp slings the epithet “anti-vaxxer” as obvious grounds for dismissing the thoughtful and nuanced judgment of a man who knows much more about vaccines than he does. Readers of The Defender are accustomed to the fact that “anti-vaxxer” has been used to defame anyone who has the audacity to ask why different rules should be applied by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in evaluating vaccines compared to every other medication. Thorp knows none of this. But as Upton Sinclair pointed out, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.” Thorp is doing his job, defending the medical establishment against people who have disruptive ideas, ideas that threaten “consensus,” threaten careers or threaten profits. Men like Thorp are useful because they don’t question the narrative, they have no time to do their own research, and they are just smart enough to make conventional “science” sound credible to those who don’t know any better. Maybe Schwinger was right: Censorship will be the death of science. But I don’t think so. Established institutions backed by government contracts and corporate interests may look like unassailable fortresses in the moment — but scientific truth always triumphs in the end.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.
SUGGEST A CORRECTION
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
 
 
NEWS
Featured Image
(LifeSiteNews) – The activities of a volunteer “anti-disinformation” initiative that has inspired tactics for official government policy provides the “missing link” between public and private censorship of the internet, according to a bombshell new collection of documents about the so-called Cyber Threat Intelligence League (CTIL). Writing at the Substack newsletter Public, journalists Michael Shellenberger, Alex Gutentag, and Matt Taibbi detail an “explosive new trove of documents” provided by a “highly credible” anonymous CTIL whistleblower that “describe everything from the genesis of modern digital censorship programs to the role of the military and intelligence agencies, partnerships with civil society organizations and commercial media, and the use of sock puppet accounts and other offensive techniques.”
 
According to the documents, the censorship framework defining the strategies of public and private censorship efforts in 2020 and beyond – including government pressure on private companies to quash objectionable content – was developed in 2019 by a group of American and British defense contractors led by former UK defense researcher Sara-Jayne “SJ” Terp, and that in addition to curbing disfavored content it entailed promoting preferred narratives through a variety of tactics, including the creation of fake or “sock-puppet” social media accounts. CTIL’s goal “was to become part of the federal government,” according to the whistleblower, who alleges to have been recruited into the project via cybersecurity meetings hosted by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). “In our weekly meetings, they made it clear that they were building these organizations within the federal government, and if you built the first iteration, we could secure a job for you.” At the very least, the group succeeded to some extent in creating what Terp called “Misinfosec communities” with government entities; in April 2020, for instance, then-director of the U.S. Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Chris Krebs touted the agency’s partnership with CTIL and the “more than 1,000 net defenders from around the world” it represented, ostensibly to “stop malicious cyber activity related to” the COVID pandemic. At least a dozen and as many as 20 people involved with CTIL were also employees of CISA and/or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and even temporarily bore their agency seals next to their names in the slack messaging system, according to the whistleblower. Among CTIL’s fruits was the creation of a strategy framework called Adversarial Misinformation & Influence Tactics & Techniques (AMITT), adapted from a cybersecurity framework by billion-dollar define contractor MITRE. AMITT was later used by the World Health Organization (WHO) to counter vaccine criticisms, and earlier this year was formally adopted by the U.S. and European Union as part of a “common standard for exchanging structured threat information on Foreign Information Manipulation and Inteference” [sic]. AMITT is not just about silencing individual pieces of content, according to the documents, but discrediting their authors more comprehensively and even pressuring for organizers of dissenting messages to be denied access to financial services.
 
 
The documents also contain further confirmation that such efforts significantly grew after 2016 as a response to Democrat Hillary Clinton’s loss of the U.S. presidency to an unlikely foe, and the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the E.U., which leftists took as signs of their weakening monopoly on what the general public knows about current events. “A study of the antecedents to these events lead us to the realization that there’s something off kilter with our information landscape,” Terp and colleagues wrote in one report. “The usual useful idiots and fifth columnists — now augmented by automated bots, cyborgs and human trolls — are busily engineering public opinion, stoking up outrage, sowing doubt and chipping away at trust in our institutions. And now it’s our brains that are being hacked.” “For a long time, the ability to reach mass audiences belonged to the nation-state (e.g. in the USA via broadcast licensing through ABC, CBS and NBC),” the report added. “Now, however, control of informational instruments has been allowed to devolve to large technology companies who have been blissfully complacent and complicit in facilitating access to the public for information operators at a fraction of what it would have cost them by other means.” Most agencies implicated in the leak predictably declined to comment, but one individual involved in CTIL simply insisted to Public that the group was “unaffiliated with any govt orgs” and “had nothing to do with the govt.” “Over the next several days and weeks, we intend to present these documents to Congressional investigators, and will make public all of the documents we can while also protecting the identity of the whistleblower and other individuals who are not senior leaders or public figures,” Shellenberger, Gutentag, and Taibbi say. Earlier this month, House Republicans released a report detailing how under Trump CISA and the U.S. State Department’s Global Engagement Center (GEC) worked with Stanford University and other entities to establish the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), through which requests to censor “thousands” of conservative posts were laundered so as to keep the government’s fingerprints off censorship.
Since then, the Biden administration has at times openly admitted that it encourages platforms like Facebook to take down certain content. Next year, the U.S. Supreme Court is slated to hear Murthy v. Missouri, which concerns whether the White House’s encouragement of private censorship constitutes a violation of the First Amendment and will have wide-ranging implications for activities like those exposed by these reports.

135 responses to “Established institutions backed by government contracts and corporate interests may look like unassailable fortresses in the moment?”

  1. This is very interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger.
    I have joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your
    great post. Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks!

  2. Unquestionably believe that which you stated. Your
    favorite justification seemed to be on the net the simplest
    thing to be aware of. I say to you, I definitely get irked while people
    think about worries that they just do not know about.

    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and also defined out the whole thing without having side effect
    , people could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more.
    Thanks

  3. Appreciating the hard work you put into your blog and in depth information you
    provide. It’s good to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t
    the same old rehashed information. Great read! I’ve bookmarked your site
    and I’m adding your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  4. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought
    this post was great. I do not know who you are but definitely
    you are going to a famous blogger if you are not already 😉 Cheers!

  5. When I originally left a comment I appear to have clicked the -Notify me when new
    comments are added- checkbox and from now on whenever
    a comment is added I receive 4 emails with the exact same comment.
    There has to be a means you are able to remove me from that service?

    Cheers!

  6. Just want to say your article is as astounding. The
    clarity on your publish is simply great and i can suppose you’re
    a professional in this subject. Well along with your permission allow me to seize your feed
    to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thank you a million and please keep up the gratifying work.

  7. My brother suggested I would possibly like this
    web site. He was once entirely right. This publish
    truly made my day. You can not believe simply how a lot time I
    had spent for this info! Thanks!

  8. My family members always say that I am wasting my time here
    at web, except I know I am getting experience everyday by reading such fastidious articles or reviews.

  9. Everyone loves what you guys are up too. This type of clever
    work and coverage! Keep up the fantastic works guys I’ve included you guys to blogroll.

  10. I think this is one of the most significant information for me.
    And i am glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, The website style is wonderful, the articles is really nice : D.

    Good job, cheers

  11. When someone writes an paragraph he/she keeps the plan of a user in his/her brain that how a user can be aware of it.
    Therefore that’s why this paragraph is outstdanding.
    Thanks!

  12. Nice weblog here! Additionally your website
    quite a bit up very fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your associate hyperlink on your host?
    I wish my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  13. I was curious if you ever considered changing the page layout
    of your blog? Its very well written; I love what youve
    got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of
    content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or two images.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

  14. My spouse and I absolutely love your blog
    and find a lot of your post’s to be just what I’m
    looking for. Do you offer guest writers to write content for
    yourself? I wouldn’t mind writing a post or elaborating on many of the subjects you write concerning here.
    Again, awesome web site!

  15. hey there and thank you for your information – I have definitely picked
    up something new from right here. I did however expertise several technical points using this site, as I experienced to reload the website lots of times previous to I could get it
    to load properly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK?
    Not that I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will often affect your placement in google
    and can damage your quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords.
    Anyway I am adding this RSS to my email and can look out for much more of your respective fascinating content.
    Ensure that you update this again soon.

  16. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest
    but your sites really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back in the future.
    Many thanks

  17. Having read this I thought it was rather informative. I appreciate you spending some
    time and effort to put this short article together. I once again find myself spending way too much time both
    reading and posting comments. But so what, it was still
    worthwhile!

  18. Howdy, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and
    i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam
    responses? If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or
    anything you can suggest? I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any support is very much appreciated.

  19. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to
    say that I’ve truly loved browsing your blog posts.
    After all I’ll be subscribing for your feed and I’m hoping you write again soon!

  20. I’ve been surfing online greater than three hours these days, but I never found any interesting article like yours.

    It is pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all web owners and bloggers made excellent content as
    you did, the web will be a lot more helpful than ever before.

  21. Magnificent goods from you, man. I have understand your
    stuff previous to and you are just extremely wonderful.

    I actually like what you’ve acquired here, certainly like what
    you’re saying and the way in which you say it.
    You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it wise.

    I cant wait to read much more from you. This is really a great web site.

  22. Greate post. Keep writing such kind of information on your page.
    Im really impressed by it.
    Hello there, You’ve performed a fantastic job. I will certainly digg it and in my view recommend to
    my friends. I’m confident they’ll be benefited from this web site.

  23. May I simply say what a relief to find someone who actually knows
    what they are talking about over the internet. You certainly realize how to bring a problem
    to light and make it important. More people must read this and understand
    this side of your story. I can’t believe you aren’t more popular given that you most certainly possess the gift.

  24. Hi, I believe your blog could be having web browser compatibility issues.
    Whenever I take a look at your site in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in IE, it’s got some overlapping issues.
    I merely wanted to provide you with a quick heads up!

    Apart from that, fantastic blog!

  25. Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is fundamental and all. But
    imagine if you added some great visuals or videos
    to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent
    but with pics and video clips, this blog could certainly be
    one of the best in its field. Amazing blog!

  26. I’m impressed, I have to admit. Seldom do I encounter a blog that’s both equally educative and amusing, and
    without a doubt, you have hit the nail on the head. The issue is something which too few folks are speaking intelligently
    about. I am very happy I came across this in my hunt for something relating to this.

  27. Right now it looks like WordPress is the best blogging platform out there right now.

    (from what I’ve read) Is that what you’re using on your blog?

  28. I’ll right away grasp your rss as I can’t find your e-mail subscription link or e-newsletter service.
    Do you have any? Please allow me know in order that I could subscribe.
    Thanks.

  29. Please let me know if you’re looking for a author for your
    site. You have some really great articles and I think I would be
    a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d love to write some articles for your blog
    in exchange for a link back to mine. Please shoot me an email if interested.
    Many thanks!

  30. Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is important and everything.
    Nevertheless imagine if you added some great photos or videos to give your posts
    more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but
    with images and video clips, this site could undeniably be one
    of the best in its niche. Fantastic blog!

  31. Its like you read my mind! You appear to know a
    lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something.
    I think that you could do with some pics to drive
    the message home a little bit, but other than that,
    this is fantastic blog. An excellent read.

    I will certainly be back.

  32. I was wondering if you ever considered changing the page layout of your blog?
    Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.

    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or 2 pictures.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

  33. I’m truly enjoying the design and layout of your website.
    It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a developer to create your theme?
    Fantastic work!

  34. Hey there! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with SEO?

    I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good gains.
    If you know of any please share. Cheers!

  35. Hi! I know this is kinda off topic however I’d figured
    I’d ask. Would you be interested in exchanging links
    or maybe guest writing a blog article or vice-versa?
    My site goes over a lot of the same subjects as yours and I think we could greatly benefit from
    each other. If you’re interested feel free
    to shoot me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from you!
    Awesome blog by the way!

  36. Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The text in your post seem to be running off the screen in Firefox.

    I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I thought I’d post
    to let you know. The layout look great though! Hope you get the issue solved soon. Cheers

  37. Somebody necessarily lend a hand to make significantly posts I might
    state. That is the very first time I frequented your web page and so far?
    I amazed with the research you made to create this actual submit amazing.
    Great task!

  38. Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems as though you relied on the video to make your point.
    You clearly know what youre talking about, why throw away your intelligence on just posting videos to your blog when you could be giving us something enlightening to
    read?

  39. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article.
    I’ll make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of
    your useful information. Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly return.

  40. Hi, Neat post. There’s an issue together with your site in web explorer, could test this?
    IE nonetheless is the marketplace chief and a huge part of other folks will omit your excellent
    writing because of this problem.

  41. I like the valuable info you provide in your articles.
    I will bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly.
    I am quite certain I will learn a lot of new stuff right here!

    Best of luck for the next!

  42. Hi there, I found your web site via Google even as looking for a comparable
    matter, your site came up, it looks great.
    I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hello there, simply become aware of your blog thru Google, and located that it’s truly informative.
    I am going to watch out for brussels. I’ll appreciate if you continue this in future.
    Lots of folks will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  43. Right here is the right webpage for anyone whoo wants to understand this topic.
    You realize a whole lot its almost hard to argue with
    you (not that I actually would want to…HaHa).
    You definitely put a fresh spin on a subject which has been discussed for decades.
    Wonderful stuff, just excellent!

    My website; ART MATERIALS

  44. Its like you learn my thoughts! You seem to grasp
    a lot about this, like you wrote the e book
    in it or something. I think that you just can do with some percent to force the message house a bit, however other than that, this is great blog.
    A great read. I’ll definitely be back.

  45. Excellent blog here! Also your website loads up fast!

    What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate
    link to your host? I wish my web site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  46. I am really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your weblog.

    Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself? Anyway keep up
    the excellent quality writing, it’s rare to see a great blog
    like this one these days.

  47. Aw, this was a very good post. Finding the time and actual effort to make a really good article… but what
    can I say… I procrastinate a whole lot and don’t seem to get anything done.

  48. Hi there, just became alert to your blog through Google, and
    found that it’s truly informative. I’m going to watch out for brussels.

    I will be grateful if you continue this in future.
    Numerous people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  49. Hello! I simply would like to offer you a huge thumbs up for the great information you have here on this post.
    I am returning to your website for more soon.

  50. I’m not sure why but this website is loading very slow for me.
    Is anyone else having this problem or is it a problem on my end?
    I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.

  51. It’s remarkable to visit this web page and reading the views of all colleagues concerning
    this post, while I am also eager of getting familiarity.

  52. It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d definitely donate to
    this brilliant blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to
    my Google account. I look forward to new updates and will talk about this blog with my Facebook group.
    Talk soon!

  53. Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all people you actually realize
    what you’re talking approximately! Bookmarked.
    Please also seek advice from my web site =). We may have a link
    change arrangement among us

  54. I’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but your blogs really nice, keep it up!
    I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back later on. All the best

  55. Hey! I could have sworn I’ve been to this site
    before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me.
    Anyhow, I’m definitely delighted I found it and I’ll be bookmarking and checking back
    often!

  56. Thank you a lot for sharing this with all people you actually know what
    you are talking approximately! Bookmarked. Please additionally consult with my web site =).
    We may have a hyperlink exchange agreement among us

  57. I’ve been browsing online greater than three hours as of late, yet
    I never discovered any interesting article like yours. It is lovely worth sufficient for me.
    In my opinion, if all website owners and bloggers made good content material as
    you probably did, the web will be much more useful than ever before.

  58. I don’t know if it’s just me or if perhaps everybody else encountering issues with your
    site. It appears like some of the written text in your posts are
    running off the screen. Can someone else please provide feedback and let me
    know if this is happening to them as well? This may be a issue with my internet browser because I’ve had this happen previously.
    Appreciate it

  59. Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The text in your content seem to be running off the screen in Internet explorer.
    I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I thought I’d
    post to let you know. The style and design look great though!
    Hope you get the problem fixed soon. Many thanks

  60. Please let me know if you’re looking for a article author for your
    site. You have some really good articles and I believe
    I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load
    off, I’d absolutely love to write some content
    for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please blast me an e-mail if interested.
    Thank you!

Leave a Reply to Gladys Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *