Big companies who brought us Toxins, food and climate changes


A series of email exchanges between Greenpeace Founder Patrick Moore and South Korean Professor Seok-soon Park shows him saying that climate change is based on false narratives and that it has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement.
greenpeace founder patrick moore says climate change based on false narratives One of Greenpeace’s founding members, Patrick Moore, said in an email why he had quit the organization: “Greenpeace was ‘hijacked’ by the political left when they realized there was money and power in the environmental movement. [Left-leaning] political activists in North America and Europe changed Greenpeace from a science-based organization to a political fundraising organization,” Moore said.This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is climate-change-famine-667x1024.jpg 15 years after he co-founded Greenpeace, Moore left the organization in 1986.
“The ‘environmental’ movement has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement,” he said. “They are primarily focused on creating narratives, stories, that are designed to instill fear and guilt into the public so the public will send them money.”This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-1.png
He claimed that they typically carry out their political operations behind closed doors with other operatives at the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and other organisations of a similar kind. He asserted that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] is “not a science organization.” The World Meteorological Entity and the United Nations Environment Program make up this political organization. This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is climate-change-prins-king-England-556x1024.jpg “The IPCC hires scientists to provide them with ‘information’ that supports the ‘climate emergency’ narrative. Their campaigns against fossil fuels, nuclear energy, CO2, plastic, etc., are misguided and designed to make people think the world will come to an end unless we cripple our civilization and destroy our economy. They are now a negative influence on the future of both the environment and human civilization.”This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-14.png “Today, the left has adopted many policies that would be very destructive to civilization as they are not technically achievable. Only look at the looming energy crisis in Europe and the UK, which Putin is taking advantage of.
This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is CO2.jpg
“But it is of their own making in refusing to develop their own natural gas resources, opposing nuclear energy, and adopting an impossible position on fossil fuels in general,” Moore wrote. The Left ‘Hijacked’ GreenpeaceThis image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is climate-change-7-479x1024.jpg The organization’s basic values, according to him, were “green” for the environment and “peace” for the people, but peace had largely been forgotten and green had taken precedence. “Many [so-called] ‘environmental’ leaders were now saying that ‘humans are the enemies of the Earth, the enemies of Nature.’ I could not accept that humans are the only evil species. This is too much like ‘original sin,’ that humans are born with evil, but all the other species are good, even cockroaches, mosquitos, and diseases,” Moore argued.This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is climate-change-4-888x1024.jpg The idea that there should be fewer people in the world is the current dominant philosophy, according to him.This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is climate-change-5-577x1024.jpg “But the people who said this were not volunteering to be the first to go away. They behave as if they are superior to others. This kind of ‘pride’ and ‘conceit’ is the worst of the Cardinal Sins,” Moore said. False Narrative on Chlorine “At the time I decided to leave Greenpeace, I was one of 6 Directors of Greenpeace International. I was the only one with formal science education, BSc Honors in Science and Forestry, and Ph.D. in Ecology. My fellow directors decided that Greenpeace should begin a campaign to ‘Ban Chlorine Worldwide.’” Moore argued that although chlorine is one of the 94 [naturally-occurring] elements on the Periodic Table and plays many important roles in biology and human health, it is also true that elemental chlorine gas is very toxic and was employed as a weapon in World War I. For instance, sodium chloride, also known as table salt, is a necessary nutrient for all animals and many plants. NaCl cannot be “banned.” He emphasized that one of the most important developments in public health history in reducing the spread of water-borne communicable illnesses like cholera was the addition of chlorine to drinking water, swimming pools, and spas. Additionally, roughly 25% of all of our medicines involve chlorine, and about 85% of pharmaceutical drugs are created using chemistry related to chlorine. Without halogens, such as chlorine, bromine, and iodine, medicine would not be the same. Halogens are all potent antibiotics. “Greenpeace named chlorine ‘The Devil’s Element’ and calls PVC, polyvinyl chloride, or simply vinyl, ‘the Poison Plastic.’ All of this is fake [and] to scare the public. In addition, this misguided policy reinforces the attitude that humans are not a worthy species and that the world would be better off without them. I could not convince my fellow Greenpeace directors to abandon this misguided policy. This was the turning point for me,” Moore said. False Narrative on Polar Bears Moore responded when asked how Greenpeace used its big contributions, saying money was used to fund “a very large staff” (possibly numbering over 2,000), extensive advertising, and fundraising initiatives. Additionally, almost all of the organization’s fundraising advertisements are founded on myths that he had thoroughly debunked in his books, with polar bears serving as one such example. “The International Treaty on Polar Bears, signed by all polar countries in 1973, to ban unrestricted hunting of polar bears, is never mentioned in the media, Greenpeace, or politicians who say the polar bear is going extinct due to melting ice in the Arctic.
 
In fact, the polar bear population has increased from 6,000 to 8,000 in 1973 to 30,000 to 50,000 today. This is not disputed,” Moore said. “But now they say the polar bear will go extinct in 2100 as if they have a magic crystal ball that can predict the future. In fact, this past winter in the Arctic saw an expansion of ice from previous years, and Antarctica was colder during the last winter than in the past 50 years.” Like many in the “climate emergency” sector, Moore said he does not pretend to be an expert or foresee the future with certainty.

The Goal of the ‘Environmental Apocalypse’ TheoryThis image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is co2-law.jpg

“I believe the human population has always been vulnerable to people who predict doom with false stories,” Moore said. “The Aztecs threw virgins into volcanos, and the Europeans and Americans burned women as witches for 200 years claiming this would ‘save the world’ from evil people. This has been [referred to as] ‘herd mentality,’ ‘groupthink,’ and ‘cult behavior.’ Humans are social animals with a hierarchy, and it is easiest to gain a high position by using fear and control.” Moore added that he is committed to proving to people that the situation is not as dire as they are led to believe that the environmental apocalypse hypothesis is really about “political power and control.” “Today, in the richest countries, our descendants are making decisions that our grandchildren will have to pay for,” he said. “Predictions that the world is coming to an end have been made for thousands of years. Not once has this come true. Why should we believe it now?” “People are naturally afraid of the future because it is unknown and full of risks and difficult decisions. I believe there is also an element of ‘self-loathing’ in this apocalypse movement.” According to Moore, today’s youth are taught that people are unworthy and are destroying the planet. They now feel guilty and ashamed of themselves as a result of this indoctrination, which is the incorrect attitude to have in life.

The Demonization of Carbon Dioxide

“Very few people believe the world is not warming. The record is clear that the world has been warming since about the year 1700, 150 years before we were using fossil fuels. 1700 was the peak of the Little Ice Age, which was very cold and caused crop failures and starvation. Before that, around 1000 A.D. was the Medieval Warm period when Vikings farmed Greenland. [And] before that, around 500 A.D. were the Dark Ages, and before that, the Roman Warm Period when it was warmer than today, and the sea level was 1–2 meters higher than today,” Moore said. “Even until about 1950, the amount of fossil fuel used and CO2 emitted were very small compared to today. We do not know the cause of these periodic fluctuations in temperature, but it was certainly not CO2.” Moore made it clear that the “minority opinion” is not about the temperature history of the Earth; rather, the relationship between the temperature and CO2 is the subject of dispute.This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is eat-bugs-and-enslave.jpg “In this regard, I agree that many believe CO2 is the main cause of warming. CO2 is invisible, so no one can actually see what it is doing. And this ‘majority’ are mainly scientists paid by politicians and bureaucrats, media making headlines, or activists making money. [The rest are] the public who believe this story even though they can’t actually see what CO2 is doing,” Moore said. Moore presented a graph showing the temperature in central England during a period of 350 years, from 1659 to 2009. He said that “If carbon dioxide was the main cause of warming, then there should be a rise in temperature along the carbon dioxide curve, but it doesn’t.” In addition to stating that CO2 is the foundation of all life on Earth and that its concentration in the atmosphere is currently lower than it has been for a significant portion of life’s history, Moore called the demonization of CO2 “completely ridiculous.”
 
‘Wind and Solar Power Are Parasites on the Economy’ “Solar and wind power are both very expensive and very unreliable. It is almost like a mental illness that so many people have been brainwashed to think entire countries can be supported with these technologies,” Moore said. “I believe wind and solar energy are parasites on the larger economy.
In other words, they make the country poorer than if other more reliable and less costly technologies were used.” According to Moore, companies that provide wind and solar energy heavily rely on government mandates, tax write-offs, and subsidies.
 
Under these mandates, people are compelled to buy wind and solar energy, even if it is more expensive, under the guise that it is “environmentally friendly.” “Millions of people pay more for wind and solar energy while a few people make millions of dollars, marks, pounds, etc. It is a bit like a Ponzi scheme in the stock markets,” Moore added. “They require vast areas of land, are not available most of the time, and require reliable energy such as nuclear, hydroelectric, [coal, and natural] gas to be available when wind and solar are unavailable.” According to Moore, the mining, transporting, and building of wind and solar farms need significant amounts of fossil fuels. In many places, they also don’t generate nearly as much energy during their lifetimes as is needed to construct and maintain them. “Why not use reliable energy [such as nuclear, hydroelectricity, natural gas, etc.] as the primary source?” Moore questioned, adding if that were the case, “then wind and solar would be unnecessary.” ‘Plastic Is Not a Toxic Substance’ “Plastic is not a toxic substance. That is why we package and wrap our food in it, to prevent it from becoming contaminated. Plastic does not magically become toxic when it enters the ocean,” Moore said.
“Of course, they say on one hand that plastic will never break down, and then, on the other hand, they say it will quickly decay into ‘microplastics,’ which, of course, are conveniently invisible so no one can observe or verify this for themselves. How clever!” Moore claims that our digestive system can distinguish between “food” and plastic or minute sand particles. No matter how minute the sand is, our body does not absorb it into our bloodstream. He claimed that, like driftwood, floating plastic in the ocean is similar to a little floating reef. It gives marine organisms a surface to attach to, lay their eggs on, and eat things that are attached to it. “Pollution is usually toxic or causes harm to life. Plastic is simply ‘litter’ beside the road. It is not hurting anything. One exception is discarded fishing nets, not because they are plastic but because they are shaped to catch fish. “The environmental community should work with the fishing industry to stop throwing damaged nets in the sea and bring them back to the dock, where they can be recycled, used in a waste-to-energy plant, or discarded safely,” Moore added.
 
 

From The Web

by Jeff Conant

November 5, 2010

from AlterNet Website

 Disastrous, in that the sudden rise in investment in biofuels led to an equally sudden displacement of food crops and helped cause the food crisis that began in 2008?

The quest to replace black fuels with green fuels is just another resource and land grab by big corporations.
Jeff Conant is a writer based in the San Francisco Bay Area. He is the author of A Community Guide to Environmental Health (Hesperian Foundation, 2008) and A Poetics of Resistance (AK Press, 2010).

While there is no doubt that we need to kick our fossil fuel addiction, how we move to cleaner and greener ways of living is still under debate. Our first attempts at using biofuels, particularly ethanol, have been largely disastrous.

But what about other plant-based fuel options?

A new report from the ETC Group (Erosion, Technology & Concentration Group) provides good reason to be suspicious – especially considering that the companies behind the new “green” fuels are,

…(to name a few), the same players that brought us the petroleum economy, the food crisis and climate chaos.

Jim Thomas and his colleagues in ETC Group are consistently at the cutting edge of watch-dogging emerging technologies, from GMOs and nanotechnology to geo-engineering and synthetic biology.

Their critique tends to combine concern over unleashing potentially dangerous elements with a social analysis that recognizes the dynamics of power behind these technologies – who stands to benefit and who stands to lose.

I spoke with Thomas about the publication of a new report by ETC Group.

Jeff Conant: You and your colleagues at ETC Group are strong advocates of taking what I would call a reasoned approach to the deployment of new technologies; you’re best known for having led the charge for a global ban on the infamous Terminator Seed, and you’ve just had a tremendous victory by winning a global moratorium on geo-engineering experiments (see last week’s piece on AlterNet).

Now, you’re releasing a report on another impending technological concern: synthetic biology.

Jim Thomas: The report is called “The New Biomassters – Synthetic Biology and The Next Assault on Biodiversity and Livelihoods.”

It’s an exposé and argument against the new “bioeconomy” most OECD countries are now promoting as the next (supposedly “green”) wave of industrial production – switching from fossil fuels to biological material (biomass) as the key feedstock of the economy.

As such, it encompasses biofuels, burning biomass for electricity, and using biomass for chemicals, plastics and other materials formerly sourced from petroleum.

JC: But isn’t this exactly what a lot of enviros want: an end to fossil fuel development in favor of renewables? What’s the concern?

JT: The bioeconomy reimagines plant life as just another source of carbon – a sort of above-ground oil reserve that can fuel the same economy we already have with just a little technological tweaking – moving from black fossil carbon to green living carbon.

While that shift in carbon feedstocks may be dressed up as a green “switch,” it is in fact a red-hot imperial resource grab – on plants, land, genes and the entire “primary production” of the planet.

Just as grabbing fossil carbon has displaced communities and fueled wars, so those who will suffer in the development of this new bioeconomy will be the traditional communities of the old bioeconomy. Another concern is, there is simply not enough biomass to make such a transition – indeed, industrial civilization is already taking too much.

There’s an assumption embedded in the UNFCCC and other climate policy that biomass is a carbon neutral energy source. That is wrong, dangerously so.

Another mistaken assumptions is that so-called next-generation biofuels (cellulosic fuels or algae fuels) are better than the disastrous first-generation biofuels.

JC: Disastrous, in that the sudden rise in investment in biofuels led to an equally sudden displacement of food crops and helped cause the food crisis that began in 2008?

JT: That, yes; but beyond that, the point that biofuels were shown to have an equal or greater net carbon footprint than fossil fuels. I don’t think most people realize that when you burn biomass for energy you can release more CO2 than coal.

Of course its assumed that CO2 will get fixed again by theoretical replacement plants over some unspecified time period, but in the process there are massive unaccounted – for greenhouse gas emissions from disturbing soils, use of fertilizers and pesticides, harvesting, transport, refining, and consuming – it can only be called disastrous.

JC: What about algal fuels? Aren’t they a way out of the biofuel dilemmas?

JT: Not really. Lifecycle analysis shows that the usual way of growing algae for fuel has a bigger greenhouse footprint than corn ethanol because there is no soil, so you need to pump a lot of fertilizer into the water. Fertilizer production is a massive energy user.

Then there is the problem of land. Algae production has to be spread out thinly because sunlight doesn’t penetrate very far into algae. So you’re talking about facilities the size of San Francisco.

And then there’s massive water use and the risks of invasive species and the fact that to make algae efficient you will probably need to genetically engineer it… and so on.

JC: And the other next-generation biofuels?

JT: With so-called next-generation biofuels we’re talking about expanding monoculture industrial plantations, either harvesting industrial crop wastes like rice straw and corn stover – rather than allowing them to replenish soil nutrients – or expanding tree plantations on so-called marginal lands where people actually live and subsist.

Already, industrial agriculture may account for more than half of global greenhouse gas emissions. Relying further on industrial agriculture to meet energy demands is hardly an improvement on the fossil economy.

JC: Yet, the Obama administration has just promised increasing investment in biofuels.

You say in the report that the first rush to promote “renewable fuels” and other supposedly green alternatives “was only a visible tip of a much deeper transition and trajectory in industrial policy,” which you call the bioeconomy.

What do you mean by this?

JT: When OECD nations and corporate lobby groups talk about the bioeconomy they’re describing a switch from industrial feedstocks to biomass across several areas – fuels, chemicals, electricity, and beyond – everything from corn ethanol to bioplastics to biomass incineration for electricity.

You know, if turning food into fuel is an unacceptable trade-off, then turning food into plastic bags is even worse.

To enable this transition, they’ll need to secure stocks of biomass in the same way they previously secured oil fields and gas pipelines. For me the shocking thing was to discover that fully 86 percent of the world’s biomass is in the tropics – the global South – where it’s already sustaining the livelihoods, cultures, and basic needs of most of the world’s people.

So a switch to biomass at any meaningful scale necessarily involves a corporate grab on the land and resources of the South. As with any previous industrial transition, what’s behind this is not high ideals, but the calculated interest of the corporate bottom line.

JC: Who’s behind the bioeconomy?

JT: We call them the new biomassters – but they aren’t really new. BP, Shell, DuPont, Chevron, Syngenta, Archer Daniels Midland, Cargill, Monsanto.

In other words, those driving the new bioeconomy are the same inequitable and polluting industries that captain the petro-economy.

There’s virtually no question that they regard the dash to biomass as a means of retooling the existing global economy without changing underlying patterns of consumption and production. If you calculate the combined worth of all the sectors that have vested interests in a new bioeconomy – energy, chemicals, agribusiness, forestry and finance corporations – you find they have a combined total worth of $17 trillion.

That’s a lot of muscle.

But it’s not just the private sector:
  • since 2008, the United Nations Environment Program is aggressively promoting what it’s calling the Green Economy Initiative

  • in 2009 the United Nations launched the “Global Green New Deal for a Sustainable Economy”

  • commodifying plantlife as a biomass carbon source is right there in the framing of the United Nations REDD Program (Reduction of Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation)

  • it’s in the very concept of “ecosystem services” – the erroneous idea that we can best protect and preserve biodiversity by putting a price on it, that all of nature is at our service to use as we please

JC: The new report broadly covers two aspects of the bioeconomy: the rush on biomass as a feedstock, and the conversion of organic matter into what you call “a platform of production” through emerging tools of synthetic biology.

Can you elaborate?

JT: Synthetic biology refers to a set of “extreme genetic engineering” techniques where you insert synthetic DNA into a cell to hijack the cell’s machinery in order to produce substances that aren’t produced naturally.

It’s repurposing simple cells like yeast and bacteria to create pharmaceutical products, jet fuels, polymers, synthetic foods. In the last five years, it’s moved from being a fringe science to attracting intense interest and investment.

For those who want to turn plant life into high value commodities, synthetic biology is a game changer – but the game they’re changing is a game we can no longer afford to play.

JC: What are the hazards?

JT: One is, again, the land grab, or rather, an Earth grab, because ultimately the advocates of the bioeconomy are seeking to gain control over the full organic production of the planet. A second hazard is the further concentration of bio-technological power in a handful of unaccountable private interests.

And of course there’s the frightening possibility of deliberate or accidental environmental release of synthetic organisms such as crops and algae, and accidental escape from the biorefineries that are already being built and operated but are little more than glorified breweries.

Since organisms like E Coli, yeast, and algae are incredibly common, there’s the very real possibility of out-crossing with natural species and contamination of microbial communities in soils, seas, and animals – including us.

Perhaps most significantly, if it works, synthetic biology allows private companies to move the production of natural materials such as rubber or medicinal compounds out of the hands of farmers working in fields and into the control of private interests controlling vats of proprietary microbes.

We are actually seeing that happen with a few commodities.

For example, Goodyear is using synthetic biology to make rubber from synthetic yeast. If they can do that at scale it could impact the economies of rubber-producing nations such as Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia.

JC: If switching from black energy to green energy won’t save the climate, what will?

JT: Firstly, restraint on the bloated economies of the north whose system of overproduction has fueled the collapse of biodiversity, global inequity and the climate crisis.

Secondly, democratic control over high-risk and unjust technologies.

Thirdly, measures to protect and build the resilience of those whose ways of life actively improve things – that is, the diverse and decentralized peasant farming systems that rebuild degraded soils, reinforce food sovereignty, and strengthen community and culture.

These existing bioeconomies, which are biodiversity-based rather than biomass-based, do a far better job of cooling the planet in a truly renewable way than any amount of biomass burners, biofuel refineries, or chemical factories of genetically-engineered microbes ever will.

Posts of matilda-macelroy.com:

Links from humanity and earth

Victory gardens

Alien, Ego and souls

Behind the current coup, alien intervention!

Attempt to radically change our economic and social lives?

Aliens and the NAZI connection

Aliens and planet Earth

Ashtar Sharon gfl W Asar Sharon & New Earth.

AETHER (FREE) ENERGY.

Carbon dioxide and Health

If our selected leaders would be more careful in choosing their words, life would more be like heaven.

Religions, The State/Media and humanity.

Remote viewing and Alien interventions on planet earth

Ancient origin.

Baba Vanga and the predictions for Europe/West.

Reels

Pictures of Bin Laden as published online?

Building a digital prison?

Bioweapons?

Chessboard of deception.

Last Step, Martial law will be introduced.

Climate change no offence mend

War on the people

Eu parliament in action

Human trafficking

Enemies of humanity.

NATO & Russia and the introduction of official censorship in the EU.

Destruction of the US/West.

The big ( Privat) Central Banks.

Population control attempts & history

The soft kill

Galactic Federations.

Star Trek,

Mind Control Techniques The fifth column,

NWO & Alien agenda!

New, Health & Bible, lifestyles!

End to Green dictate by the EU, IMF, World Banks others.

Use of blackmail & distortion

Pope and climate change?

UN & NWO Monkey Virus DNA Found in COVID-19 Shots

Cheats, liars and greed our newly elected Saints.

Dissident control in China being copied by the WEST?

Globalist fantasies?

Med Care, alien development and offer!

“We are the Borg. Resistance is futile. Your race will be assimilated and service to us.”

NWO and WEF plus free energy.

“A Covenant With Death”, by Bill Cooper.

WHO attempted power Grab!

The great Awakening, Plandemic 3 Video, please click on link:

The Great Awakening (Full, Unedited Movie) (rumble.com)
rumble.com/v2s0gp8-plandemic-3-the-great-awakening-full-unedited-movie.html

Pushing the reset button

Energy as a Vehicle of Control and the War on Carbon.

‘The world’s gone mad!’

A conspiracy against god and man! 

Slavery, Power/Greed! 

Humans reduced to a commodity! 

Can the West still turn the tide of tyranny? 

Conspiracy and the coming witch hunt. 

Investigative journalist Seymore Hersh published a shocking article based on whistleblower testimony about the blown-up gas pipe in Europe.
How they managed to capture/control the masses in The West.
Did UFO interfere with nuclear war heads?
Remote viewing, Scientology and CIA Google at the core of the Cabal?
WEF/NWO and UKRAINE
Mind Control using electromagnetic Frequencies. The US government and mind reading!
Manipulation our environment/health?
The Marcabians and President Eisenhower!
Food and depopulation and still making a profit!
Censorship, the collusion between The big tech media & politics.

humanityandearth.com links:

De-population attempts? The great food reset. The physical Universe. Antarctica and the hollow planets! Is planet Earth hell? Humanity & History! Health and Ageing! Mind control, US destruction from inside out! Africa, Marduk’s Bluff? & Alien response & Putin. The Biofield and low frequent EM field/waves. Liberalism now lost? Dulce, New Mexico, whistle-blower rapport by Thomas Edwin Castello. Numbers 3, 7, 9,11,13, 33, 39.and the Free- Masons & illuminati. Loosh, energy generated by all organic life forms. Mad Science from Dr Mercola publication. End of the Western Democracy and liberalism.

Banning Early Treatment Was a Crime Against Humanity?  Messing with vaccinations?  Big Data, Transhumanism & Why the Singularity May Be Faked. Skull and Bones Society & Thule society!  UFO & CIA  By Ron Hubbard, Founder. Messing with our food?  Power & greed, pushing for the economic collapse or great reset. Forcing the New Dystopian future. History of the human build UFO’s Humanity being sold like cattle, agenda 21 UN. EU Central bank, pushing for Digital currency. Fake Meat & Junk Food Pushing for a nuclear war?
 

88 responses to “Big companies who brought us Toxins, food and climate changes”

  1. I was curious if you ever considered changing the structure of your
    blog? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
    But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better.
    Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or 2 images.
    Maybe you could space it out better?

  2. I am really enjoying the theme/design of your website.
    Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility problems?
    A small number of my blog readers have complained about my
    website not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Opera.
    Do you have any suggestions to help fix this problem?

  3. Just want to say your article is as astounding. The clarity on your submit is just cool and i can assume you are an expert in this subject.

    Fine with your permission allow me to seize your RSS feed to
    keep up to date with impending post. Thanks a million and please carry on the enjoyable work.

  4. I believe this is one of the so much important info for me.
    And i’m glad reading your article. However should commentary on some general issues, The web site style is perfect, the articles is truly
    great : D. Good task, cheers

  5. It is appropriate time to make some plans for the long run and it’s time
    to be happy. I’ve read this post and if I may just I wish to suggest you some attention-grabbing
    issues or suggestions. Perhaps you could write next articles
    relating to this article. I desire to learn more issues approximately it!

  6. hey there and thank you for your information – I
    have certainly picked up something new from right here. I did however expertise some technical points using this web site, since I experienced
    to reload the site many times previous to I could get it to load correctly.
    I had been wondering if your hosting is OK? Not that I’m complaining, but sluggish loading
    instances times will very frequently affect your placement
    in google and could damage your quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords.
    Well I’m adding this RSS to my e-mail and can look out for a
    lot more of your respective exciting content.
    Ensure that you update this again very soon.

  7. Howdy are using WordPress for your site platform? I’m new to the blog world
    but I’m trying to get started and create my own. Do you need any html coding knowledge to make your own blog?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  8. Excellent blog! Do you have any recommendations for aspiring writers?

    I’m hoping to start my own site soon but I’m a little lost on everything.
    Would you propose starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a
    paid option? There are so many choices out there that I’m totally
    confused .. Any recommendations? Thanks!

  9. My partner and I stumbled over here coming from a different website and thought I may as well check things out.

    I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to looking over your web
    page for a second time.

  10. I’ll immediately clutch your rss as I can not in finding
    your e-mail subscription link or newsletter service. Do you have any?
    Please let me recognize in order that I may subscribe.

    Thanks.

  11. whoah this weblog is wonderful i love studying your posts.
    Keep up the great work! You already know, a lot of persons are looking
    round for this info, you could aid them greatly.

  12. Hi there justt wanjted too give yoou a quick heads up and
    lett you knopw a ffew off thee ikages aren’t loaing properly.
    I’m nott sjre whyy bbut I think itts a liunking issue.

    I’ve trued it in two different web browsers annd both show tthe same outcome.

  13. You are so cool! I don’t suppose I have read
    through a single thing like that before. So nice to
    find someone with a few unique thoughts on this topic.
    Seriously.. many thanks for starting this up. This site is one
    thing that’s needed on the internet, someone with a little originality!

  14. This iss the perfect web sitee for everyone who wihes too find out about this topic.

    Yoou undersrand sso much itss almoost harfd tto arrgue with youu (not tuat I reallpy would want to…HaHa).

    Youu certanly putt a neww spon onn a subnject that haas been discussed for a long time.
    Great stuff, jyst excellent!

  15. Interesting blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?
    A theme like yours with a few simple tweeks would really make my blog
    jump out. Please let me know where you got your theme. Thanks a lot

  16. Its such as you learn my thoughts! You appear to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or
    something. I believe that you can do with a few % to pressure the message home a little bit, however instead
    of that, this is magnificent blog. A great read.
    I’ll certainly be back.

  17. Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads
    up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading properly.
    I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue.
    I’ve tried it in two different internet browsers and both show the same outcome.

  18. You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something that I
    think I would never understand. It seems too complex
    and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  19. I don’t even know the way I stopped up here, however I assumed this post used to be
    great. I do not recognize who you might be but definitely you’re going to a well-known blogger should you aren’t already.
    Cheers!

  20. Hi I am so thrilled I found your web site,
    I really found you by mistake, while I was researching
    on Yahoo for something else, Nonetheless I am here now and would just like to say thanks a lot for
    a incredible post and a all round exciting blog (I also love
    the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the moment but I have saved it
    and also added your RSS feeds, so when I have time I
    will be back to read more, Please do keep up the awesome work.

  21. It’s appropriate time to make a few plans for the longer term and
    it is time to be happy. I have learn this put up and
    if I may I wish to counsel you few attention-grabbing issues
    or advice. Perhaps you could write subsequent articles regarding this article.
    I want to read even more things about it!

  22. Hmm it seems like your site ate my first comment
    (it was super long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I had written and say,
    I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog. I too am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to
    the whole thing. Do you have any helpful hints for novice blog writers?
    I’d genuinely appreciate it.

  23. After I originally commented I seem to have clicked on the -Notify me when new comments
    are added- checkbox and now whenever a comment is added I recieve 4 emails with the same comment.
    Perhaps there is a means you are able to remove
    me from that service? Cheers!

  24. With havin so much content do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright
    violation? My website has a lot of unique content I’ve either
    authored myself or outsourced but it appears a
    lot of it is popping it up all over the web without
    my agreement. Do you know any techniques to help stop content from being ripped off?
    I’d certainly appreciate it.

  25. Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with Search Engine Optimization?
    I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good success.
    If you know of any please share. Appreciate it!

  26. I do agree with all of the concepts you’ve presented on your post.
    They’re very convincing and will certainly work. Still, the
    posts are too quick for starters. Could you please lengthen them a
    bit from subsequent time? Thank you for the post.

  27. My spouse and I stumbled over here different web page and thought I might check things out.

    I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward
    to looking over your web page again.

  28. I like what you guys are up too. This sort of clever work and coverage!
    Keep up the excellent works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my own blogroll.

  29. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your blog.
    It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant
    for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer
    to create your theme? Exceptional work!

  30. What i don’t realize is in fact how you are no longer really a lot
    more smartly-liked than you might be right now. You’re so intelligent.
    You know thus considerably in the case of this topic, produced
    me in my opinion believe it from so many numerous angles.
    Its like men and women are not interested until
    it’s one thing to accomplish with Woman gaga! Your individual stuffs great.

    Always care for it up!

  31. Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and
    found that it is truly informative. I am gonna watch out for
    brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future.
    Lots of people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  32. You actually make it appear so easy together with
    your presentation however I find this matter to be really something
    that I feel I would never understand. It kind of feels too complex and very extensive for me.
    I’m looking forward on your subsequent publish, I’ll try to get the grasp of it!
    I saw similar here: sklep internetowy
    and also here: e-commerce

  33. I’m really enjoying the theme/design of your website. Do you ever run into any browser compatibility problems?
    A couple of my blog visitors have complained about my blog
    not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Safari.
    Do you have any tips to help fix this problem? I saw similar here: Najlepszy sklep

  34. Hi there! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO?
    I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but
    I’m not seeing very good success. If you know of any please share.
    Appreciate it! You can read similar text here: Najlepszy sklep

  35. Hello there! Do you know if they make any plugins to
    assist with Search Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get
    my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m
    not seeing very good success. If you know of any please share.
    Appreciate it! You can read similar text here: Sklep

  36. Hi! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with Search Engine
    Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for
    some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good gains.
    If you know of any please share. Cheers! You can read similar text here:
    Auto Approve List

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *